Navigation
Home | Links | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) | Videos | Scarlett | Site notices
About This Site
About
A personal weblog with photographs and comments. Quiet ramblings, quite rambling...
Members
Most recent entries
- Descending Chalkpit Lane
- Does Surrey County Council have a target culture?
- New personal speed record
- Greenhill Shaw to Slines Oak Road
- Bluebells in Great Church Wood
- Wild Garlic
- Do we have inconsiderate and impolite horse riders?
- A reclining cyclist
- Half-way on the Bristol to Path Railway (Cycle) Path
- Some children are such a drag
- High Rennaissance
- Be thar band ‘o pirates in Bath?
- Fish on its Head
- The River Avon
- Green shoots
Recent entries with comments
- A shrine on Limpsfield Road - (4)
- Zebra Crossing Part Two - (1)
- Courchevel - (2)
- Mersea Island - (2)
- Old school rice packaging - (1)
- Were you one of these car drivers in Oxted who nearly killed me yesterday? - (4)
- This Charming Man - (2)
- The Front of Hever Castle - (2)
- Barcelona sunset - a short time-lapse - (1)
- Ragwort - (1)
- Taking the goat - (3)
- Gay parking only - (2)
- Two Father Christmases - (1)
- A novel approach to sending emails - (3)
- More on the Missing Bees - (3)
Feeds
Categories
Monthly Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
Links
- Full linklist
- Bluemeanie.org
- Scarlett's weblog
- GeoURL
- Blogflux
- LS Blogs
- Blogwise
- Wikablog
- Technorati
- Blogarama
- Oxted Frappr
- Bloggernity.com
- The Blog Directory




- The Green Providers Directory
Lately listening to
Site Statistics
- This website has been viewed 1663446 times
- Page rendered in 0.3664 seconds
- 68 queries executed
Site Credits
- Based on a design by:
BlogMoxie 
The original content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Next entry: The usual Oxted view
Previous entry: Raindrop on leaf
![]()
There are 19,000 known species of bees worldwide and about 260 in the United Kingdom, according to Dave Cushman. However only six bumblebees are commonly found in our gardens, according to the Natural History Museum and (according to their chart on the previous link) this bee is a Bombus terrestris. I believe this is the most typical bumblebee that we encounter. There is also a lot of information about these creatures on bumblebee.org.
In the photo above, the wings of the bee appear so small in relation to it’s body and it reminds me of the science has proved that bees can’t fly urban myth.
The “science has proved that bees can’t fly” urban myth originated in a 1934 book by entomologist Antoine Magnan, who discussed a mathematical equation by Andre Sainte-Lague, an engineer. The equation proved that the maximum lift for an aircraft’s wings could not be achieved at equivalent speeds of a bee. I.e., an airplane the size of a bee, moving as slowly as a bee, could not fly. Although this did not mean a bee can’t fly (which after all does not have stationary wings like the posited teency aircraft), nevertheless the idea that Magnan’s book said bees oughtn’t be able to fly began to spread.
It spread at first as a joke in European universities, at Sainte-Lague’s & Magnan’s expense. But later it became a “fact” among the gullible or the uneducated not smart enough to get the joke. Later still it became a “fun” experiment to develop complex mathematical theories both to explain how insects fly, or why they can’t—scientific intellectual sophism.
And of course last year a scientist “proved” that pterodactyls were too heavy to fly. Let me rephrase that: according to a newspaper a scientist “proved” that pterodactyls were too heavy to fly.
Filed under: Europe • United Kingdom • England • (2) Comments • Permalink • Bookmark or Share •
And of course there are non-native populations of bees which are believed to have a negative effect on the environment: competing for pollinators with natural bee populations and pollinating non-native weeds.
Over here there is a big market for Australian and New Zealand honey. It is therefore interesting to find out that we probably shouldn’t be supporting these industries as the honey producing bees are aliens. (I’ve been avoiding imported honey for years in any case because of the food miles issue).
There are over 1,500 indigenous species of bees in Australia.
The smallest is 2 mm long.
The largest is 12 times longer than that.
They can be coloured red, green, black, grey, yellow, covered in blue polka dots, furry, shiny, fat, or thin.
Australian stingless bees make a tasty and nutritious meal.
Only 1% of Australian bee species are social. Like the human variety most do not have queens, workers, or drones.
Many do not produce hexagonal honeycomb cells. Cells can be arranged in pods, or in spiral patterns.